FBI Director Kash Patel, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, and Utah District Attorney Jeffrey Grey have all provided evidence that the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk was deeply motivated by leftwing ideology.
Suspect Tyler Robinson's own mother said he had become "more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented" and was dating "a biological male who was transitioning genders." His father said Tyler "accused Kirk of spreading hate."
In a confession to his transgender lover, Lance Twiggs, Tyler confessed to the murder and when prompted for his motive, said "I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out."
If all of this was not enough, Tyler confessed to writing pro-trans, pro-Antifa messages on his ammunition. The bullet that killed Kirk had "Hey Fascist, Catch!" written on the casing.
Meanwhile, ABC News says Robinson's messages to his trans lover about murdering someone were "very touching."
MSNBC referred to Kirk as an "agitator" and "provocateur" while claiming no one on the internet "is cheering for this."
It takes three minutes on the internet to see this is false, as demonstrated by our previous reporting. A website dedicated to exposing people compiled a list of 63,000 known people who openly cheered for Kirk's murder.
Jimmy Kimmel claimed Tyler Robinson was "MAGA."
This clip was from his Monday show. He offered no retraction after Tuesday's press conference from DA Grey that clearly spelled out the shooter's motive.
CNN tried to claim to Sen. Ted Cruz's face that the motive is unknown:
Montel Williams also tried to claim on a CNN panel that the 22-year-old suspect is a "love-torn child."
CBS News anchor John Dickerson was forced to admit Tuesday that leftwing ideology motivated the shooter:
Dickerson had claimed the "motive remains elusive" just the night before (even though authorities have stated the motive clearly and repeatedly over the last week).
This purposeful withholding of information and narrative spin isn't limited to cable news, either. It can be seen everywhere, even Substack articles.
If you read the reporting from major newspapers like The New York Times, you will see how they couch the motive to cast doubt on Robinson's very clear leftwing ideology.
The text messages are illuminating, but they do not show Mr. Robinson discussing which specific views of Mr. Kirk's he found to be hateful.
As new details showcasing Robinson's far-left extremism emerge, will the media report on it, ignore it, or try to paint the assassin as the victim?
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
